| Join us Today |
| To Stop Lawsuit Abuse. |
| Protect Our Jobs, Economy & Freedom. |
Our congratulations to Wheeler Trigg & O’Donnell’s Evan Stephenson for his mention in Law Week Colorado’s “2011 Up-and-Coming Lawyers.”
Evan is an active participant in CCJL’s Legal Advisory Board (LAB) and, last spring, authored an insightful op-ed in The Denver Post, exposing the proposed Senate Bill 107 (2011) as a ruse to enrich plaintiffs attorneys, soak Colorado employers and drive up insurance costs while having very little impact on drunk drivers. Read more
One of America’s most tireless advocates for common sense in the courtroom, Walter K. Olson, editor of Overlawyered.com, will keynote the annual Colorado Civil Justice League Awards Luncheon on Dec. 13.
Olson is also author of Schools for Misrule: Legal Academia and an Overlawyered America, Rule of Lawyers: How the New Litigation Elite Threatens America’s Rule of Law, and Litigaton Explosion: What Happened When America Unleashed the Lawsuit.
The annual event also recognizes Colorado state senators and representatives who have cast courageous votes in defense of consumer choice and economic growth. Each award-winning legislator will receive CCJL’s Common Sense in the Courtroom Award.
Reservations are required for the luncheon at the Westin Tabor Center, 1672 Lawrence in Denver. Check-in begins at 11:30 a.m. with the luncheon beginning promptly at 12 noon.
Colorado Civil justice League applauds a unanimous decision by the Colorado Supreme Court which will benefit both employers and employees.
The decision in Lucht’s Concrete vs. Horner (Case No. 09SC627) reversed a Court of Appeals ruling that held that continued employment is not adequate consideration for a noncompetition agreement once an employee has been hired.
“We find no distinction between a decision to agree to a noncompetition agreement offered at the initial hiring period and a decision to agree” after employment has begun, wrote Justice Allison Eid.
Vote for the Most Ridiculous Lawsuit of the Month for May!
Read more
An op-ed column in the April 17 Pueblo Chieftain by CCJL’s Mark Hillman apparently got under the skin of Colorado Trial Lawyers Association vice president James M. Croshal, whose letter to the editor displayed tactics with which defendants against frivolous lawsuits are all too familiar.
After claiming that the op-ed was “inaccurate and untrue,” Croshal engages mostly in argument and identifies only one “fact” as untrue:
In a case that illustrates the absurdity of last November’s Colorado Supreme Court decision to enshrine victims’ phantom damages, the same court will hear arguments in Crossgrove v. Walmart.
To hear trial lawyers and their anti-business enablers tell it, the only thing that prevents Colorado employers from literally chaining workers to their desks is the “right to sue” their dastardly bosses. In this fantasy world, trial lawyers never bring frivolous lawsuits and fired employees never file dubious claims motivated but grudges against their former employers.
In fact, listening to testimony recently on Senate Bill 72 (sponsored by Sen. Morgan Carroll, D-Aurora, and Rep. Claire Levy, D-Boulder), the uninitiated could be forgiven for wondering — given the obvious virtue presumed by the bills’ supporters — why the sponsors don’t propose a new law that simply accepts employees’ claims at face value, dispenses with the inconvenience of a trial, and orders those heartless employers to immediately deposit funds into plaintiffs’ bank accounts.
Maybe that’s on their agenda for next year.
Despite the sponsor’s effort to find common ground with the bill’s critics, Democrats on the Senate Local Government Committee today sided with trial lawyers and against doctors, families and Colorado businesses to kill House Bill 1106 on a 3-2 party-line vote.
Presented to overturn a bizarre 4-3 decision by the Colorado Supreme Court in November 2010, HB 1106 clarified how medical costs should be calculated in personal injury cases. The court’s majority found that injured plaintiffs were entitled to “billed” medical costs — even when the billed amount greatly exceeded the amount ultimately paid. A survey by Colorado Civil Justice League of recent cases found that billed amounts sometimes exceeded the paid amount by two, four or, in one case, eight times.
